Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 32 of 729.
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@rp_griffin it's part of the sample scheme too, so weighting had limited effect — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@rp_griffin though it does seem like we were probably helped by weighting on this. final national poll LV is 21% Dem primary in 20; 15% GOP primary in 20, which seems like it lines up with your figures above if I understand it. Dems in 20 primary: Biden 94-4 Dems no 20 primary: Biden 78-14 — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@rp_griffin i think it's entirely plausible that this issue is deeply related to the problem. we've always weighted on primary vote history, but perhaps we fail to reach a representative group of less-engaged, non-primary voters, so weighting doesn't help — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@Wertwhile broadly despondent. haven't gotten around to publishing, but tldr: our polls look fantastic other than the one thing that matters — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
The Times/Siena polls were often weighted on party x primary, but they were as bad as everyone else's polls. And one thing that seemed to help other polls--weighting on self-reported 2016 vote--would have pushed us even farther toward Biden — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
One challenge in the post-election polling autopsy world: there's a lot of idiosyncratic data. What works on one team's data may not work on another https://t.co/R3ttRYVyHN — PolitiTweet.org
Robert Griffin @rp_griffin
#AAPOR ICYMI @johnmsides and I examined major explanations for polling error in 2020. The big takeaway: Evide… https://t.co/0fOSUKUujC
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Oz has steadily gained as Election Day votes get counted, but one interestingly McCormick still narrowly leads in the still-incomplete Election Day count — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
He's seen enough Madison Cawthorn https://t.co/K5nYAzEB9l — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
I've seen enough: Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R) has lost renomination to state Sen. Chuck Edwards (R) in the #NC11 GOP primary.
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Doesn't mean he can't pull it off, but he'll need these precincts to be among his very best of the night. And there are still five precincts from Henderson County, where he's losing the Election Day vote. — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Here's one simple way to look at it: in Cawthorn's best county, he won the seven Election Day precincts by 406 votes. There are 24 precincts left, so matching that performance exactly would yield 1392 votes. He's down 1533 votes. — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Madison Cawthorn's path to victory is starting to look awfully narrow. Most of the remaining precincts are on his turf--and he'll win them big--but based on the average votes per precinct so far, he would probably need to win them by >30 pts. He isn't doing that anywhere — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
One not-entirely-surprising pattern so far this primary season: Trump-backed candidates faring best on Election Day; moderates faring well in the early vote. PA is an especially clear case right now. All of the GOP vote you see is mail. It's like looking at a different universe. — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
The first seven Election Day precincts offer some fragmentary but real hope for Madison Cawthorn, who still trails by 11 points in the count of mainly early votes. He's faring 14 points better in the Election Day vote than he did in the early vote from the same counties — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Madison Cawthorn trails by 11 points among early voters in the NC-11 primary, with nearly all counties reporting their early vote. Election Day votes, of course, may differ. — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@RossRichendrfer lol oh good, carry on — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@RossRichendrfer gross — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@baseballot an R+7 mean median gap doesn't mean much in a state like NY (note the initial dem map) — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Now all that said, I certainly agree with Dave on the point he's made, even if it's not the point I've emphasized: a map with a lot of competitive, if still Democratic-leaning, CDs could cost the Democrats a lot of seats in a 'red wave.' — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
My view is that we care most about the neutral year where House control is likely to be at stake. And the neutral year is where the map can shine for Dems, as it basically has the maximum number of Biden/Dem PVI seats--only one fewer than the outright Democratic gerrymander — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
My view is that we care most about the neutral year where House control is likely to be at stake. And the neutral year is where the map can shine for Dems, as it basically has the maximum number of Dem PVI seats — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
A second framing question: do we mainly look at this in terms of 2022--a presumed GOP wave, where the GOP can reasonably hope to flip these Biden+6 to +10 CDs and could win a lot of seats--or in terms of 2024/a more neutral or even Dem year? — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
I should also note that I suspect Dave agrees with me on this, as his own map featured seven Trump districts https://t.co/XIOBi7VpGg — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
So this map is pretty comparable to the final map proposed by the *Dem* commissioners, and generally better for Dems than the other proposals considered. The party didn't get what it wanted, but it probably came out ahead as a result of what it tried to pull off — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
(and indeed, Names/Letters--two earlier proposals-- were worse for Dems per FiveThirtyEight) https://t.co/EMNRHr6aEu — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
One way to see it: look at the maps proposed by the defunct commission. Final GOP proposal: 7 Trump; 8 Trump-PVI, 9 GOP or competitive (<55% biden here) Final Dem: 5, 7, 9 This map: 5, 5, 10. Names/Letters were even worse for Dems IIRC than the final maps — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
One important place to start: do we compare this new map to the previously enacted map? Or do we compare it the likely alternatives? My tweet compares it to the likely alternatives, and, yes, I do think this is about as good as Democrats might have hoped — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
It seems like there are a few differences of either framing or opinion on this map, so let me walk through why I framed it the way that I did https://t.co/zpx4DVSVWw — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Not unexpected, but this NY map is pretty bad news for Democrats. With so many competitive seats, it's not hard to… https://t.co/DaKrhIdSek
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
The newly proposed New York map is pretty close to a best case outcome for Democrats, with just five Trump districts (v. four on the previously enacted map). Many competitive Biden-tilting CDs, but all voted more for Biden than nation as a whole. https://t.co/jPIDarNM8R — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Campbell @JonCampbellNY
NEW: Special master Jonathan Cervas has released his preliminary NY congressional map. https://t.co/u1E42hiorR
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
RT @jamalgreene: Reminder that much Electoral Count Act reform would insulate this kind of scheme from congressional review. No great answe… — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@nataliemj10 @rp_griffin @RyanDEnos ideology is about a belief system, so if you don't want self-report then you have to ask about the beliefs at the core of various ideologies and evaluate how they affect whatever it is you care about — PolitiTweet.org