Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 163 of 504.
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Can confirm at least one such poll. — PolitiTweet.org
Fernand R. Amandi @AmandiOnAir
Buckle up. There’s going to be some absolutely devastating poll results released in the next 24-48 hours that are g… https://t.co/5iZBBcyX6N
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Big disagree from me on this. Guess who won all four of these in 2018? Bill Nelson (D), who is no longer a senator. — PolitiTweet.org
OuiCestMoi @Arnaud5566
@Redistrict @DemFromCT I will just focus on Pinellas, St Lucie, Duval and Seminole. If Biden wins them, game over.
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@Nate_Cohn If Trump were at 60%-39% w/ 75k counted, I'd think the best he could hope for is winning Sumter like 65%-34% w/ another 20k or so EDay votes. That's not far off from what polls would suggest, and imo it would confirm a disastrous drop-off in 65+ support for the president. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @JacobRubashkin: This kind of whiplash is so unsustainable. Will this decision stand? Will it be appealed? Early voting in Texas starts… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@AstorAaron Key word “somewhat” - clearly better than ‘16 Trump but not near Bush ‘04 levels — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @NateSilver538: Yeah, there's been lots of uninformed speculation about how the networks will handle election night. With decision desks… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Right now, both are somewhat succeeding. The problems for Trump, though, are that: 1) non-college whites are a much higher % than non-whites in several key battlegrounds 2) there's just no rolling back the clock w/ *college whites,* who are more anti-Trump than ever — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The fascinating thing to me right now is that both candidates are, to some extent, trying to roll back the clock: Trump by restoring R support among Latino/Black voters to Bush '04 levels, Biden by restoring D support among non-college whites to Obama '12 levels. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@Nate_Cohn Just curious, what would you say if we had 75k+ Sumter votes counted and it was 60%-39% Trump? — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @DLeonhardt: Much savvier. https://t.co/5HlyeQOZm2 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Reminder of voting preference by method, per new @pewresearch national survey (10k+ RVs): Mail (39%): 69%-27% Biden Early in-person (21%): 55%-40% Biden Election Day (33%): 63%-31% Trump These stories don’t tell us anything about the outcome. https://t.co/m91P0vQRMq — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Here's why I have a hard time imagining 25k EDay ballots left to count on top of 75k mail/early votes: on 8/31/20, Sumter only had 103k total registered voters. Let's say another 3k registrants before book closing. That'd be 94% turnout! In 2016, Sumter turnout was 83%. — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@Redistrict even at 75 you're just not out of the woods on trump cleaning 2/3 of the major party vote. Trump>80 on… https://t.co/vfivIRo…
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@Nate_Cohn Again, only if the early/mail over something like a 75k vote threshold. If it's well below that, I certainly wouldn't be drawing conclusions — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@Nate_Cohn *62%-37% Trump — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@Nate_Cohn But let's say 75k Sumter early/mail votes go 62%-37% Biden. Then we get another 25k EDay ballots that go 81%-18% Trump. That puts Trump up 67%-32%. That's still 7 points down from the 42 point margin Scott won there in '18 - and Scott did really well in Miami-Dade/Osceola! — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@Nate_Cohn Yes, that's why two-to-one is referring to the *total, completed* Sumter vote, not just the early/mail vote. If you think Trump can win FL w/ less than a two-to-one lead in Sumter, I think that's a mistake. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@Nate_Cohn That's why I'd caveat it by saying >75k votes counted. If it was substantially less than that, it'd show Trump has shifted a lot of his vote in senior-heavy areas to Election Day, in which case there's a larger potential for a pro-Trump swing when EDay votes are added. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
If, on the other hand, we see Sumter mail/early results come in at something like 66%-33% for Trump, we're likely talking about a very close race in FL - and it's going to be a much longer night. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
At this point, several House Rs would probably be politically wise to start making this case/throwing Trump under bus. — PolitiTweet.org
Sahil Kapur @sahilkapur
Thom Tillis is talking openly about a Trump defeat: “The best check on a Biden presidency is for Republicans to hav… https://t.co/dwcgyN6zeq
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@MichaelDavSmith Personally yes, although a network wouldn't. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
If we see Sumter mail/early results at 7pm that come in something like 62%-37% for Trump w/ more than 75k ballots counted, I'd personally consider that to be game over for the president. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Pro tip: if Trump doesn't win Sumter Co. (The Villages) at least two-to-one, he's not winning FL - or a second term. In 2016, it went 68%-29% Trump. 84% of Sumter's '16 vote was cast early/by mail (vs. 69% statewide), so we should have a good sense pretty early. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
My brief yard sign analysis of the election: the bold type Bid🇺🇸n/Harris logo is a big improvement on the Clinton “H➡️” — PolitiTweet.org
TheSunShineBoresTheDaylightsOutOfMe @SunBores
@Redistrict Friend in Sarasota area says there are a surprising number of Biden signs. 🍀?
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
But we’re likely to have the opposite counting order in much of the Upper Midwest/other states. If FL goes Biden, game over for Trump. If it’s close/narrowly Trump, we’re just going to have to wait in MI/PA/WI/AZ...possibly days/weeks. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The difference is we’re likely to get a huge initial burst for Biden in FL b/c they count mail in advance and release the totals at poll closing; it’s going to be Trump who needs to catch up in the 8/9/10pm hours. — PolitiTweet.org
Norman Ornstein @NormOrnstein
@Redistrict @pewresearch I would like to see the numbers for Florida. If they show a different pattern, and if Bide… https://t.co/1tibg57JBo
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @TexasTribAbby: Here we go. Texas is in play at the presidential level. But not in the way you think it is. https://t.co/ylMZcC9KsC — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@pstrasberg Good for you, but my point wasn't about your enthusiasm. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
I realize Fairfax's long lines will end once satellite voting locations open on 10/14. But all over the country, I do wonder if news footage of huge early voting lines discourages low-propensity voters by giving the (mostly false) impression that voting necessarily takes hours. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@skywalkerbeth A few other neighbor localities (% of total 2016 turnout): Fairfax City: 37% Alexandria City: 36% Arlington Co.: 32% Loudoun Co.: 32% Prince William Co.: 27% — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Falls Church, VA is already at 50% of its *total* 2016 ballots cast. Neighboring Fairfax County, VA at just 17% b/c of its long early voting lines. https://t.co/k1oOfGahJY — PolitiTweet.org