Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 169 of 496.
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@LeeMiringoff The well-documented problem is that the '16 exits were way too college-heavy. Census data yields a '16 WI electorate that was 59.7% non-college white. Adjusting for population change since '16 yields ~57%. But if turnout goes up in '20 (a good bet), NCW % likely goes up too. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
This underscores the urgency for Trump of getting much closer to his '16 numbers among non-college whites. Even if you crank up their turnout to 100%, his current weaker standing w/ them vs. Biden just won't cut it. For Biden, it's all about just holding the line. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Also, in the above map, I'm assuming every demographic group sees a 5 point turnout bump vs. '16, but being extra-generous to Trump by assuming a 10 point bump in non-college white turnout. Even so: Biden 375, Trump 163. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
As you might glean, it's not *that* far off from what state polls are showing! The notable exceptions might be: 1) FL, where Trump's gains w/ Hispanics have outpaced his national gains 2) GA, where non-college white voters are less elastic than they are in Upper Midwest — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
If you were only to go by September's live-interview national polls (averaging demographic crosstabs, ignoring state polls), here's how that might roughly translate in the Electoral College: https://t.co/TkXkxY9Lxb https://t.co/bfpIOIAbK7 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Among Hispanic voters, Biden's average lead so far in Sept. is 60%-32%, up from 56%-31% in Aug. (Clinton led 61%-23% in final 2016 polls). Not surprisingly, Trump's gains in past month have been concentrated among whites. Race looking more racially polarized as Nov. approaches. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
A positive sign for Biden: among Black voters, he leads 87%-7% so far in the average crosstabs of September's live-interview polls. That's up from 83%-9% in August polls (Clinton led 83%-5% in 2016's final pre-election polls). — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Beware polls that aren't weighted by education. A new WI survey showing Biden up by more than others has a sample that's 52% non-college whites. In reality, non-college whites are poised to be at least 57% of all WI voters. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @BruneElections: A bit misleading. 95% of total Ohio ballots should be counted on election night. Democrats will likely gain ~1% after f… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@grace_panetta The 2022 House map is nonexistent AF — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Something everyone needs to be prepared for: viral, propagandistic and false insinuations of election misconduct. This is an especially complicated, fraught election for election officials to administer. Mistakes will be made - and overwhelmingly *not* out of nefarious intent. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Also extremely unusual: DOJ releasing *for whom* military ballots were cast, especially before the matter has been fully investigated. — PolitiTweet.org
Trip Gabriel @tripgabriel
"William P. Barr briefed Trump this week on the details of an ongoing DOJ voter fraud investigation, according to a… https://t.co/gO7tCcpED5
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
There are, however, two easy opportunities to neutralize Trump attacks I’m surprised the Biden campaign *hasn’t* taken so far: 1) go to Miami and give an anti-Putin/communism speech 2) tout support from a multi-racial coalition of sheriffs/police chiefs in swing state ads — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
On Election Night, no one: “Joe Biden would have this in the bag right now, except back in September he called a press lid to do debate prep.” — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The main argument for FL vs. AZ: African-American share (14.5% vs 4.4%). But the white vote is also far more polarized in FL. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @grace_panetta: New: I dug into ballots rejected for lack of secrecy envelopes, or "naked" ballots in Pennsylvania — there have been pro… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Two other big reasons I’m more bullish on Biden’s chances in AZ than FL: 1) AZ’s vote is a lot more metropolitan (no real north FL/Panhandle, though Mohave Co. and the Villages are similar I guess) 2) AZ’s Latinos tend to be of Mexican rather than Cuban ancestry — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
AZ and FL are demographically similar in a lot of ways (Hispanic share, seniors, etc.). But one thing going for Dems in AZ as opposed to FL: a much higher share of Asian/Native American/other eligible voters (7.1% vs. 3.3%). — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
There’s gotta be a more flattering photo of this R candidate his campaign could’ve used. #ME02 https://t.co/CiznkfocHR — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@Real_BenShapiro Just one scenario...also think it's possible Biden gets 17 million more votes than Clinton. Mainly I think turnout's just going to be way up from '16 in general. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
By the way, the only Trump '16 turf Biden flips blue in this Dem nightmare scenario: Omaha's #NE02. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Here's why it's possible - though unlikely - Trump could lose the popular vote by 5 million! and still win reelection by a comfortable margin in the Electoral College. https://t.co/RAud6tHKVu https://t.co/uKyLNVNUQT — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@PatrickRuffini Except, their movement from 2016 to 2020, in an overwhelming number of polls, has been anti-Trump (or perhaps anti-Clinton to pro-Biden). — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Is this doable for Trump? I'd argue it's *likely.* But the problems for Trump are...1) today, Biden's winning a much higher share of non-college whites than Clinton did and 2) both college whites and non-whites are likely to spike in turnout as well. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Interesting finding: to offset non-college whites' decline as a share of adult citizens since '16, Trump would need to boost their turnout from 55% to ~60% *just to get back to* 306 Electoral votes. https://t.co/RAud6tHKVu https://t.co/VNe2WrDx4w — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
FAQ: a few have asked but no, the term “swingometer” is not a reference to Jerry Falwell, Jr. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Bad #ElectionTwitter pickup line: "Hey there, want to slide into my...DeMographic Swingometer?" The wait is over.… https://t.co/ZeSF1Pa6cg
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Among the least persuasive arguments I ever hear from candidates/campaigns: "our early vote numbers look really good." — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
As @steveschale pointed out, Duval, FL should be on this list. Btw, there are a few on here I consider *very* likely flips, including Seminole, Johnson, Morris and Chesterfield. There are others I consider real reaches for Biden, including Ada, Collin and Spokane. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @kirk_bado: New from me in HARRISBURG: https://t.co/tz3DOrQQb4 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @HotlineJosh: “The media are right to brace the public for a week or more of counting. But preaching patience is different from predicti… — PolitiTweet.org