Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 3, 2022

Created

Wed Aug 12 15:25:45 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The NYT thing is hard for me to take very seriously, but I would guess/hope that it is not a major factor in adding uncertainty. Historically, it doesn't really do a great job of predicting volatility, after all — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 12, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Well there are two separate issues here. The omission of approval certainly moves their fundamentals-based forecast to the right, creating more mean revision. Just how much, IDK? But it may also reduce the weight of H2H polls, which are largely collinear https://t.co/cV0K3iypZV — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn I get that you have to be deferential before the master but a model that takes the physical dimensions o… https://t.co/8Ckivw1Vx0

Posted Aug. 12, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

sorry, to clarify--the *omission* of approval may *increase* the weight of H2H polls. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 12, 2020 Hibernated