Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 165 of 496.
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @kkondik: Beyond much more serious credibility issues, this White House has long needed some serious copy editing help https://t.co/4nyb… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Might be time for the Biden camp to rethink pulling those negative ads. — PolitiTweet.org
Kaitlan Collins @kaitlancollins
President Trump’s doctor says he’s 72 hours into the diagnosis. Another physician says Trump received a special ant… https://t.co/jUVKR90rdt
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
I know there are reasons we don’t drag 15 year olds into this and all, but when they start becoming more reliable sources of information than their parents... — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @politicoalex: BREAKING: Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien has tested positive for Covid-19 https://t.co/9DH9OhFgv6 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
How to run for reelection on Staten Island 101... #NY11 — PolitiTweet.org
Max Rose @MaxRose4NY
People always say, never check your Twitter mentions. I thought, how bad could it be? https://t.co/nBlolEo5O4
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Fact check: there are still 32 days to go. — PolitiTweet.org
Lisa Lerer @llerer
"The 2020 election was always going to end like this." @alexburnsNYT captures the moment. https://t.co/0k0Up7YvNq
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
And there you have it... — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Martin @jmartNYT
NEWS: @JoeBiden is taking down his negative ads, going all-positive, per source familiar. Decision was made *bef… https://t.co/emCyd70gtd
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @jmartNYT: NEWS: @JoeBiden is taking down his negative ads, going all-positive, per source familiar. Decision was made *before* WH pu… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Does Biden at least temporarily pull all negative ads? — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @maggieNYT: Via pool report, Trump is going to Walter Reed. Two sources familiar with the plan say he's expected to undergo tests. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Speaking of Grand Rapids, an often-overlooked message one sharp Dem data analyst told me this morning is testing off the charts w/ low-propensity voters in swing states on social media: replacing Betsy DeVos. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
That Biden is delivering his entire speech in Grand Rapids with a mask on speaks volumes more than any remarks he's delivering, and he knows it. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Rating change: House Transportation & Infrastructure Chair Rep. Peter DeFazio (D) moves from Likely D to Lean D at @CookPolitical, as "Paris train hero" Alek Skarlatos (R) moves within striking distance in #OR04. https://t.co/BXKO3TLGcX — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Hint: can't believe I used the phrase "wacky alt-scientist who believes urine holds the secret to human life extension" in my writeup of this district. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
House rating change involving a fairly high-profile incumbent coming to @CookPolitical shortly. Stay tuned... — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@JHagner Once you have a critical mass of ~200n FL Latino subsamples that all demonstrate some degree of underperformance vs. '16 - and are consistent w/ national polls - you start taking note! With respect to VBM data, we just don't have many priors for this situation. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Enthusiasm about voting is running extremely high among both Biden voters (especially mail/early) and Trump voters (Election Day). **For the millionth time, beware news stories attempting to draw meaningful conclusions about the election outcome from VBM data** — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@ThePlumLineGS You know better than to read anything into this... — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @SherylNYT: Health Secretary Alex Azar, on the Trump family's failure to wear masks at the recent debate despite a requirement for the a… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@ForecasterEnten Where is our national CNN/SSRS poll? I’ve been waiting... — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
One voter registration bright spot for Dems: #NE02 (Omaha, 1 EV)... January 2020: 161k R, 152k D, 111k Other October 2020: 166k R, 161k D, 116k Other — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @Redistrict: At this rate, there’s still time for 5-7 more major bombshells to not upend the race between now and November. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @joemmathews: After White House officials learned of Hicks’ symptoms, Trump and his entourage flew to New Jersey, where he attended a fu… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Only thing worse than last presidential debate: next presidential debate on Zoom. — PolitiTweet.org
Jessica Huseman @JessicaHuseman
Oh my god is the next presidential debate going to be on zoom
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
I've seen enough — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @pkcapitol: Trump is threatening to force election into federal courts and, if time runs out, believes House will give him a 2nd term. B… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Making sound judgments on Election Night - when data is flying faster and more furiously than any one person can handle - requires a team. Fortunately, major networks employ experienced teams. Responsible 11/3 coverage demands statistical rigor, transparency & patience. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
In other words, I'd expect that for every 98 times "I've seen enough" ends up being correct, there might be two times it ends up being incorrect. I'm comfortable w/ that level of risk on most nights. But on 11/3, the stakes are way too high to mischaracterize results. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
My general approach to "seeing enough" on Twitter is to make that declaration at a ~98% personal confidence interval, whereas a media organization might prudently wait to project a race at a ~99%+ confidence interval. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
This might be a good opportunity to explain why I will *not* be saying "I've seen enough" on Election Night 11/3 (besides the main reason, which is a longstanding contractual obligation w/ a network desk)... — PolitiTweet.org