Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 313 of 729.
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Just happened to be checking myself--on the right, our preelection projection for Sanders strength; on the left, wh… https://t.co/XvHf5saWSI — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
The needle is operating at the precinct level. So, for instance, it knows/thinks Bernie's best precincts in Black Hawk near UNI are already counted https://t.co/FWF9qbmeZV — PolitiTweet.org
Fluffy @fluffyglof
@Nate_Cohn Is the needle based on precincts reporting or counties as a whole? Like in Polk, more urban remain that… https://t.co/bC2SM1ChV3
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Our precinct maps are great. https://t.co/JhvCqvArQn https://t.co/oJNepoEZ2X — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
It was pretty easy to imagine Pete winning on SDEs while Sanders won the most votes. No conspiracy required https://t.co/CZTc4mb0cg — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
RT @SeanTrende: With 62 percent reporting, Buttigieg is leading Bernie Sanders by about two points. Please be aware that 62 percent of pre… — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
In the popular vote, Sanders is an 87 percent favorite to win the most votes on first alignment. The two seem poised for an even split in the pledged delegates to the DNC — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@ETTC19 pledged delegates aren't state delegates — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
...and published. — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Buttigieg with a 74 percent chance to win the most SDEs, according to our estimates The returns so far are fundamen… https://t.co/cKPxMX7LSd — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Needle is at the gate of the internet, awaits the removal of the yellow warning box we put up last night to be lifted away — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
New needle in route to internet, with blockage cleared. It will not attempt to save the old one if it is still alive — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
it's been that kind of caucus i guess — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Needle maybe a little lost somewhere in route to the internet lol — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Needle in route to the internet. Stand by. 🚨 https://t.co/qXwEnKm3Qf — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@jonathanchait the post page is wrong; those aren't sdes — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Well, with live results is that you never know what's going to happen until you get the data. For the nerds: NAs instead of 0s, not expected; correlated error parameter for county results, not precincts. Missing satellite data. Now we may just be mean-medians on box plots away — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Over all, I see no reason to think that Sanders *will* come back. But Sanders is also close enough--and SDEs noisy enough--that I don't think you'll see any calls. — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Under more systematic examination, I don't see much reason to think these precincts are fundamentally unrepresentative Characteristics of uncounted v. counted prec Bernie '16: 50% uncounted v. 51.9% counted Pre-election Sanders est: 24% uncounted, v. 24.8% counted — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Black Hawk County could be a possible exception on the Bernie side — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
NYT precinct result map now has data. Just eye balling it, doesn't seem like either candidate would have an obvious edge in what's left https://t.co/JhvCqvArQn — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Not a bad series of results for our poll, between the first alignment numbers so far and the entrance poll data on the composition of the electorate https://t.co/SFgsxHUw0O — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Eyeballing the results by county, it does not seem to me that there's a disproportionate amount of outstanding vote in Bernie counties. So the results aren't obviously unrepresentative (even if they might be under closer examination) — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Hard to add much until we start getting the data on here https://t.co/JhvCqvArQn — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
I'm seeing some popular vote tallies around here but I dont' know whether they're first or final alignment and I'm holding off on tweeting them until then — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Now we wait for data. If we get it by precinct in the way we expected heading into the night-lol-then we should be able to say more — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Buttigieg with a narrow lead with 62% reporting on SDEs Buttigieg 26.9 Sanders 25.1 Warren 18 Biden 15 Doubt that's enough for a network projection. Don't know much about whether it's representative, so be cautious — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
As a general proposition, the media organizations aren't usually able to project even fairly competitive races with ~62% counted. If it's extremely representative, maybe in a 4 pt race. — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
But we're running it on background and we'll relay if data comes through — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
We haven't been told anything about what we're getting, so we're not putting up a live forecast for now (we don't want to be in a situation where, say, they announce topline results w Buttigieg ahead, but the needle doesn't get data and stays on its narrow Sanders prior) — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
NYT results page. Take two. https://t.co/eYEkOaZ8Ur — PolitiTweet.org