Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

THIS is hysterical — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@LeahLitman well his wife is an election denier so this comes as know surprise. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@ilyseh and they might be, er, soggy — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@froomkin @_cingraham @knightfdn @jimbrady No decent journalist should participate in this farce — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@AdamKinzinger subpoena him, put him under oath, let him decide what the truth is — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Dems run on this: The radical rightwing sct wont let us defend us vs. climate change. If you care about the planet vote for us and we'll fix it - AND the court — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@DemocracyDocket Oh. My. Gosh. John Eastman is laughing all the way to the bank... — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

abortion advocates in Mich and Ohio, they are confronting advocates of forced birth: organizing and taking their pop position to voters https://t.co/qEhgbM24Lb — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

And the 3 progressives are the only textualists on the court. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

It is a great argument for term limits and filibuster repeal. The court is making it impossible to govern and is so badly out of step with society it resorts to 19th century values, prejudices, biases, inequity to govern the 21st century. Enough already. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

The decision creates massive confusion about what a major question. It disregard the broad delegation in the statute itself and ignores the leg history. Once more, the court gaslights us, reasoning backwards, imposing its anti-govt bias on a mod soc of which it understands little — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

OUCH! "Some years ago, I remarked that “[w]e’re all textualists now.”.. It seems I was wrong. The current Court is textualist only when being so suits it. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

But nowhere does the majority provide evidence from within the statute itself that the Clean Power Plan conflicts with or undermines Congress’s design. That fact alone makes this case different from all the cases described above — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

The majority claims it is just following precedent, but that is not so. The Court has never even used the term “major questions doctrine” before. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

And even then, it does not address straight-up what should be the question: Does the text of that provision, when read in context and with a commonsense awareness of how Congress delegates, authorize the agency action here? — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Kagan: The maj says it is simply “not plausible” Congress enabled EPA to reg power plants’ emissions through generation shifting. Ante, at 31. But that is just what Congress did when it broadly authorized EPA in Sec 111 to select the “best system of emission reduction” — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@matthewamiller after the 500th admin law case the court will give up and try a diff rule. in the meantime, chaos because these people have no concept of the real world and how govt functions — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Kagan: " The Court appoints itself—instead of Congress or the expert agency—the decisionmaker on climate policy. I cannot think of many things more frightening." Well except for... — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@LeahLitman another good reason to get rid of filibuster- to have a functional govt and do all this delegation you cannot have a 60 vote threshold — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @LeahLitman: This decision solidifies a doctrine that will be a cudgel against administrative agencies looking to exercise their statuto… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@steve_vladeck going to be litigating what is and is not major until the cows come home .. or die of heat prostration — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Chevron lives but in an overheating world? — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@LeahLitman https://t.co/SbzI1buie1 — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@mikememoli @POTUS this is also critical for the party to grasp to unite the country in defense of freedom, self-determination https://t.co/SbzI1buie1 — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

If S Ct strikes down climate change regulation Dems can run on that too. One way to get young people out in force — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@edokeefe @POTUS Bingo. And there you have it. NOW are critics happy? Now go organize. https://t.co/hcwRGtCgFl — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

BRAVO — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@dfarber @davidfrum correct: poorly understood by both media and progressives complaining : https://t.co/hcwRGtCgFl — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @JesseFFerguson: 🚨🚨 New @NavigatorSurvey polling SCOTUS Favorability is now -3. ** Fav: 44% (28% with independents) ** Unfav: 47% (53… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@saletan Had about about tfg https://t.co/y1KZ0S1CYD — PolitiTweet.org