Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin

@JRubinBlogger ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 12, 2022

Created

Thu Jun 30 14:30:41 +0000 2022

Likes

285

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

And even then, it does not address straight-up what should be the question: Does the text of that provision, when read in context and with a commonsense awareness of how Congress delegates, authorize the agency action here? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2022

Preceded By

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Kagan: The maj says it is simply “not plausible” Congress enabled EPA to reg power plants’ emissions through generation shifting. Ante, at 31. But that is just what Congress did when it broadly authorized EPA in Sec 111 to select the “best system of emission reduction” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2022

Followed By

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

The majority claims it is just following precedent, but that is not so. The Court has never even used the term “major questions doctrine” before. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2022