PolitiTweet Archive
Home Figures About
Donate
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin

@JRubinBlogger ↗

  • Overview
  • Archive
  • Deleted
Deleted No
Hibernated No
Last Checked July 12, 2022

Created

Thu Jun 30 14:30:53 +0000 2022

Likes

376

Retweets

59

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

The majority claims it is just following precedent, but that is not so. The Court has never even used the term “major questions doctrine” before. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2022

Preceded By

Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

And even then, it does not address straight-up what should be the question: Does the text of that provision, when read in context and with a commonsense awareness of how Congress delegates, authorize the agency action here? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2022

Followed By

Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

But nowhere does the majority provide evidence from within the statute itself that the Clean Power Plan conflicts with or undermines Congress’s design. That fact alone makes this case different from all the cases described above — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2022

© 2025 Politiwatch. Tweets and other media belong to their indicated owners; all other materials are licensed CC-BY-SA. If you use PolitiTweet professionally, please feel free to let us know. Note that PolitiTweet stopped archiving new tweets on April 3, 2023, when Twitter disabled our API access.