Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Biden is in favor of lots of things - e.g. voting rights but that changes exactly nothing. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Media frenzy over Biden saying he is favor of the filibuster is precisely what's wrong with media. It means nothing. It changes nothing. The votes weren't there yesterday; they aren't there now. Democrats need a few more Senate seats. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Trump played song from Cats to calm himself down in White House, his staff claim .. did they consider an elephant tranquilizer? https://t.co/ttjvlcdlG0 — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@ZcohenCNN @RepLizCheney whoever THAT person is, Hutchinson has provided name to the committee. That person now in BIG legal jeopardy — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

watch the hyperbole. the S Ct did not end EPA ability to address climate change. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@MuellerSheWrote @ThePlumLineGS @RepRaskin immunity — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@ThePlumLineGS @RepRaskin terrific column on why Cipollone could be so valuable. You really want to be a witness, not a target in this unfolding crime scene — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

THIS is hysterical — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@LeahLitman well his wife is an election denier so this comes as know surprise. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@ilyseh and they might be, er, soggy — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@froomkin @_cingraham @knightfdn @jimbrady No decent journalist should participate in this farce — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@AdamKinzinger subpoena him, put him under oath, let him decide what the truth is — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Dems run on this: The radical rightwing sct wont let us defend us vs. climate change. If you care about the planet vote for us and we'll fix it - AND the court — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@DemocracyDocket Oh. My. Gosh. John Eastman is laughing all the way to the bank... — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

abortion advocates in Mich and Ohio, they are confronting advocates of forced birth: organizing and taking their pop position to voters https://t.co/qEhgbM24Lb — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

And the 3 progressives are the only textualists on the court. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

It is a great argument for term limits and filibuster repeal. The court is making it impossible to govern and is so badly out of step with society it resorts to 19th century values, prejudices, biases, inequity to govern the 21st century. Enough already. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

The decision creates massive confusion about what a major question. It disregard the broad delegation in the statute itself and ignores the leg history. Once more, the court gaslights us, reasoning backwards, imposing its anti-govt bias on a mod soc of which it understands little — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

OUCH! "Some years ago, I remarked that “[w]e’re all textualists now.”.. It seems I was wrong. The current Court is textualist only when being so suits it. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

But nowhere does the majority provide evidence from within the statute itself that the Clean Power Plan conflicts with or undermines Congress’s design. That fact alone makes this case different from all the cases described above — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

The majority claims it is just following precedent, but that is not so. The Court has never even used the term “major questions doctrine” before. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

And even then, it does not address straight-up what should be the question: Does the text of that provision, when read in context and with a commonsense awareness of how Congress delegates, authorize the agency action here? — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Kagan: The maj says it is simply “not plausible” Congress enabled EPA to reg power plants’ emissions through generation shifting. Ante, at 31. But that is just what Congress did when it broadly authorized EPA in Sec 111 to select the “best system of emission reduction” — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@matthewamiller after the 500th admin law case the court will give up and try a diff rule. in the meantime, chaos because these people have no concept of the real world and how govt functions — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Kagan: " The Court appoints itself—instead of Congress or the expert agency—the decisionmaker on climate policy. I cannot think of many things more frightening." Well except for... — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@LeahLitman another good reason to get rid of filibuster- to have a functional govt and do all this delegation you cannot have a 60 vote threshold — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @LeahLitman: This decision solidifies a doctrine that will be a cudgel against administrative agencies looking to exercise their statuto… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@steve_vladeck going to be litigating what is and is not major until the cows come home .. or die of heat prostration — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Chevron lives but in an overheating world? — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@LeahLitman https://t.co/SbzI1buie1 — PolitiTweet.org