Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 11, 2022

Created

Thu Feb 03 16:07:15 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@EricLevitz @mattyglesias @MattBruenig (eric adams is an exception in that regard; it'll be interesting to see how he plays out as a model, esp since black voters are really the only democratic constituency with the potential to nudge the party in a less elite direction) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 3, 2022

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@EricLevitz @mattyglesias @MattBruenig i don't entirely disagree, but note that these examples are basically entirely vestigial--the still very real yet unmistakably fading remnants of an earlier era of politics — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 3, 2022

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

I'm seeing a fair amount of fighting over this tweet. Whether it's right depends on the meaning of 'very substantial,' ofc, and it's hard to assign probabilities to a lot of this But it is at least a real possibility at this point. Let's work through it https://t.co/cTW5VpDQN9 — PolitiTweet.org

There is a very substantial chance that Dems can keep the House with an R+1 vote in 2022. https://t.co/bEeSib0BAl

Posted Feb. 3, 2022