Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 26, 2022

Created

Wed Dec 29 22:24:19 +0000 2021

Likes

170

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Why? Districts represent geographic areas. In lopsided states, a party tends to nearly everywhere. To take extreme ex, imagine a state where Reps won 70/30... but there was no place where Dems won. There's no way you could draw 30% of dists for the Dems. (WY/WV is an IRL ex) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 29, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Here's a common one: proportionality. Dems got 65% of the major party vote; they get 80% of seats. I understand that response, but in all seriousness: proportionality is a great criteria, especially in lopsided states. In fact, the GOP gets ~ fair share https://t.co/fJXCfqVobZ — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn Because the party that won 63% of the vote in CA in 2020 was given over 80% of the districts, despite th… https://t.co/cLKaeD1aLR

Posted Dec. 29, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

We can measure this phenomenon in a pretty simple way: what percentage of people *live* in Democratic precincts? what percentage *live* in Democratic counties? That's slightly different than vote share, but it's the one that really informs this problem. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 29, 2021