Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked April 6, 2021

Created

Tue Apr 06 13:06:48 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

There are things that blur the line, where ensuring access can mitigate the risk of subversion. If I want to overturn the election by throwing out ballots purportedly cast by dead people, it would help if there's a law saying you can't disenfranchise people on such a list — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 6, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Voter suppression affects whether or how people cast ballots. You address it with laws ensuring access to the ballot. Election subversion might entail attempting to manipulate or overturn results. You can't address it by ensuring access to voting. https://t.co/RlSRTNBBof — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn ELI5 what’s the difference between the two? Feels to me like election subversion is included in what I w… https://t.co/a6BLiWH6OK

Posted April 6, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@nintendobenzo @JoshEsrick understanding them together in a single picture has, in practice, just meant one of the two being ignored — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 6, 2021