Profile Image

Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated No
Last Checked April 6, 2021

Created

Tue Apr 06 13:02:04 +0000 2021

Likes

0

Retweets

0

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Voter suppression affects whether or how people cast ballots. You address it with laws ensuring access to the ballot. Election subversion might entail attempting to manipulate or overturn results. You can't address it by ensuring access to voting. https://t.co/RlSRTNBBof — PolitiTweet.org

Rufus @nintendobenzo

@Nate_Cohn ELI5 what’s the difference between the two? Feels to me like election subversion is included in what I w… https://t.co/a6BLiWH6OK

Posted April 6, 2021

Preceded By

Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

No. Election subversion is a different *kind* of risk than voter suppression, requiring different analysis and different legal remedies. (and it's *published* today... written last week...) https://t.co/dSELCQEbYM — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Jarvis @jeffjarvis

After his prior column predicting little impact on turnout was used by the right and certain TV commentators yester… https://t.co/YBhld1HdSs

Posted April 6, 2021

Followed By

Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

There are things that blur the line, where ensuring access can mitigate the risk of subversion. If I want to overturn the election by throwing out ballots purportedly cast by dead people, it would help if there's a law saying you can't disenfranchise people on such a list — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 6, 2021