Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 3, 2022

Created

Fri Nov 20 14:53:21 +0000 2020

Likes

269

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

And most of all, this theory assumed--implicitly--that all Dems needed to do was win 2016, as the president had maxed out his support, hadn't won any new converts, and couldn't compete in a higher turnout election. That assumption was wrong — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 20, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The evidence never really matched this theory IMO, but it looks even worse today. The black share of the electorate did not increase, and quite possibly dropped. The voter file data we have so far suggests that the partisan turnout balance was unchanged or even *better* for Rs — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 20, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Instead, Biden wound up winning in a way that I think many post-2016 post-mortems allowed as a possibility, but that I think had relatively few advocates: more-or-less run the Clinton playbook, but with a less polarizing candidate — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 20, 2020 Hibernated