Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted Yes

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 3, 2022

Created

Wed Nov 18 14:00:37 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Unavailable

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

And since this wasn't clear, this implies that the 'new' white/black/hisp voters in ATL were somewhat more supportive of Trump than those who voted in 2016. That said, small differences; small samples. Not at all definitive https://t.co/KwiXfOlXjn — PolitiTweet.org

The Times/Siena data doesn't show any meaningful difference between those with a 2016 or a 2020 record of voting, w… https://t.co/rgBAqBh3nq

Posted Nov. 18, 2020 Deleted Hibernated Just a Typo

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Anyway, I don't think this constitutes definitive proof. But if the Times/Siena data were taken as authoritative on this question--and I don't think it can be--then you probably would have to attribute most of that 85% shift to voters actually changing their mind — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 18, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

And since this wasn't clear, this implies that the 'new' white/black voters in ATL were actually somewhat more supportive of Trump than those who voted in both 2016 and 2020. That said, small differences; small samples. Not at all definitive https://t.co/KwiXfOlXjn — PolitiTweet.org

The Times/Siena data doesn't show any meaningful difference between those with a 2016 or a 2020 record of voting, w… https://t.co/rgBAqBh3nq

Posted Nov. 18, 2020 Hibernated