Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 3, 2022

Created

Thu Oct 22 00:10:41 +0000 2020

Likes

237

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

And if you look everywhere else, you've got mix of great-for-Biden-IA-like polls (Q in TX, Fox MI, Civiqs MN/NV) and murkier-PA-like number (Fox and LD in WI, DFP in MI, maybe the Ipsos AZ number), and some in between (like every FL poll) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 22, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

And if you look everywhere else, you've got mix of great-for-Biden-IA-like polls (Q in TX, Fox MI, Civiqs MN/NV) than murkier-PA-like number (Fox and LD in WI, DFP in MI, maybe the Ipsos AZ number), and some in between (like every FL poll) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 22, 2020 Deleted Hibernated Just a Typo

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

If PA wasn't the most important state, we wouldn't have to think too hard about all of this and we could just split the difference and declare, Biden+9 nationally and so on. But it is that important, so parsing out just how good those PA polls really are for Biden is important — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 22, 2020 Hibernated