Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 3, 2022

Created

Wed Aug 12 13:11:29 +0000 2020

Likes

222

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Looking back through these notes, most are reasons why there might be somewhat less uncertainty, so I guess I take the over on p(Biden). But fundamentally, this forecast thinks about this stuff a lot more like I do than the competition and it'll be fun to watch — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 12, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Looking back through these notes, most reasons why there might be somewhat less uncertainty than the forecast, so I guess I take the over on p(Biden). But fundamentally, this forecast thinks about this stuff a lot more like I do than the competition and it'll be fun to watch — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 12, 2020 Hibernated Just a Typo

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Well there are two separate issues here. The omission of approval certainly moves their fundamentals-based forecast to the right, creating more mean revision. Just how much, IDK? But it may also reduce the weight of H2H polls, which are largely collinear https://t.co/cV0K3iypZV — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn I get that you have to be deferential before the master but a model that takes the physical dimensions o… https://t.co/8Ckivw1Vx0

Posted Aug. 12, 2020 Hibernated