Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 29, 2020

Created

Tue May 19 14:44:46 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Similarly, our NYT/Siena polls in October would have been Biden+6 (rather than +2) without education or turnout weights (like most state polls) https://t.co/OSyhp4NzNc — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 19, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

But take the national polls in '16. They would have been Clinton+8 without education weights https://t.co/FaV1BaodOt — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 19, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Notice, btw, that there's no big difference on party ID. These polls are weighted on party registration/primary vote history where available. And yet you can have a very meaningfully different result — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 19, 2020 Hibernated