Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 29, 2020

Created

Tue May 19 14:43:07 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

But take the national polls in '16. They would have been Clinton+8 without education weights https://t.co/FaV1BaodOt — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 19, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Now, that doesn't mean that every poll without education weights is off by 4 points from the 'truth.' It means that is' 4 points off of what it *would have been* if it had been weighted by education. Maybe a poll without cells or edu weights might post an 'accurate' result! — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 19, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Similarly, our NYT/Siena polls in October would have been Biden+6 (rather than +2) without education or turnout weights (like most state polls) https://t.co/OSyhp4NzNc — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 19, 2020 Hibernated