Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 14, 2020

Created

Sat Apr 25 15:03:03 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

One thing definitely changed for the better: fewer undecided voters, esp in the Midwest. So, even if the polls are just as bad, they'd still be more accurate. Indeed, the Midwestern polls today are better for Trump than '16. Many have found him up in WI, for ex., vs. 0 in 16' — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 25, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

It's a good question, and there isn't an overwhelmingly clear answer, but here are a few thoughts https://t.co/yISvB1Q8mS — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn Hey Nate! I am curious, how have polls changed in the last four years so that we should trust them more… https://t.co/4m3iZwpCq8

Posted April 25, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Another thing has definitely changed for the better, at least in some cases: more pollsters weighting on self-reported education; failing to do so was considered major driver of the polling error. Nowhere near all do this, to be sure. But, still more than '16. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 25, 2020 Hibernated