Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 17, 2020

Created

Wed Feb 05 17:15:55 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The tightest screen--only Almost certain--would have been most accurate, with an average error of 1.2: Sanders 25.6, Buttigieg 20.2, Warren/Biden 15.0. Could be noise though, as we fall to N=323 here — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 5, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

If we change our likely voter screen to the same as the Selzer poll (Almost certain, very likely as 100%; all else as zero), our result is Bernie 24.7, Buttigieg 18.9, Warren 15.2, Biden 16, which brings our average error down to 1.4, the exact same as the Selzer poll — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 5, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

As a general proposition, our turnout data suggests that this kind of tight, non-probabalistic screen isn't the bes… https://t.co/JTJMPiQp9u — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 5, 2020 Hibernated