Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 28, 2020

Created

Wed Sep 18 16:18:20 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

As an aside, our voter file data from L2 thinks the black share of the electorate in Wisc. was lower in '18 than in '16 (though quite similar, at 2.8 and 2.9% of the vote). These modeled estimates are generally low, so I'd guess we're talking more like ~4% in reality — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 18, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The statewide margin was really small: Trump +23k, or +.7%. And that tiny margin means that a 2012-repeat in Mil. (though not 08/04) would have *barely* won it for Clinton. But OTOH, I just don't see how you can look at that and say that Mil. was the central issue here for Dems — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 18, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@xenocryptsite this would be credible if anyone, at the time, actually believed that clinton "shouldn't have lost black turnout." at best, there was a debate about whether clinton--or any non-black dem--could match obama. if anyone thought dems should count on it, i don't remember it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 18, 2019 Hibernated