Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 28, 2020

Created

Thu Aug 15 19:41:44 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ChangePolls an incomplete list: you have MI08 as 6 pt error for us and 1 for you, it's 3 or so for both. i find this hard to understand. You don't include WI01 and NY01, where you have double digit errors. IL14 was basically our most accurate late poll and you have it as a 2 pt error, so on — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 15, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ChangePolls i assume this wasn't intentional, as you're calling attention to it and showed your work, but: --you omitted several polls where we both polled and you did poorly --there are substantial factual errors in the tallies you do include --with 538 data, avg error is nyt 3.4 v. 4.6 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 15, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ChangePolls anyway i don't think your record in these districts is bad. 4.5 pts or so is a fine performance in house races. but the inaccuracies and omissions are tough to stomach, especially since they overwhelmingly go your direction — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 15, 2019 Hibernated