Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 28, 2020

Created

Fri May 24 17:12:17 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

IL-14 was one of the last districts we decided to poll in 'wave 1,' before we started repolling races. The article characterizes Underwood, the Dem, as being seen as 'destined to lose' up until a few days. But as that choice implied, it's not quite how we saw it — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 24, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

My feed involves a fair amount of commentary on the piece mentioned below by @ForecasterEnten I'm not going to comment on it, but I am going to take it as an excuse to talk about IL-14, maybe my favorite polls of our cycle https://t.co/EYYkXPZnkC — PolitiTweet.org

Can I explain why I'm not enamored with this piece? It's because it suggests a mode of thinking I think is improper… https://t.co/TmHhu5FlRY

Posted May 24, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

When we first polled the race, we found Hultgren ahead by 4 points, 47-43. But there were lots of intriguing signs under the hood. We found Trump's at -3 approval a district he won, with an R+9 sample. 42% had no opinion of the incumbent, one of the lowest of any poll — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 24, 2019 Hibernated