Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 16, 2021

Created

Wed Aug 04 15:29:56 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@donnellymjd @apoorva_nyc @dzeitzoff I'm not missing it at all. It's a very important qualification. It's important enough, in fact, that it renders the apocalyptic tone of the article completely incongruent, which may be why Times *readers* clearly missed it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 4, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@apoorva_nyc @dzeitzoff You also left out many concerns that experts have about the Provincetown study. So while nothing in the story may be false per se, there are sins of omission as well. https://t.co/emaRN93Ior — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 4, 2021

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@donnellymjd @apoorva_nyc @dzeitzoff Also, it's not a 100% accurate description of the research. It is a *highly* debatable conclusion. All the research found is that vaccinated and unvaccinated people who tested positive did not have statistically distinguishable Ct values over a small, non-representative sample. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 4, 2021