Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 16, 2021

Created

Wed Aug 04 14:58:59 +0000 2021

Likes

425

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@apoorva_nyc @dzeitzoff You also left out many concerns that experts have about the Provincetown study. So while nothing in the story may be false per se, there are sins of omission as well. https://t.co/emaRN93Ior — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 4, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@apoorva_nyc @dzeitzoff People read lede paragraphs, headlines, tweets and *tone* much more than they read every word in a story. And your tone in that story, especially the earlier versions, was completely out of proportion to the underlying scientific significance of the findings. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 4, 2021

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@donnellymjd @apoorva_nyc @dzeitzoff I'm not missing it at all. It's a very important qualification. It's important enough, in fact, that it renders the apocalyptic tone of the article completely incongruent, which may be why Times *readers* clearly missed it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 4, 2021