Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 16, 2021

Created

Wed Aug 04 15:35:49 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@donnellymjd @apoorva_nyc @dzeitzoff Also, it's not a 100% accurate description of the research. It is a *highly* debatable conclusion. All the research found is that vaccinated and unvaccinated people who tested positive did not have statistically distinguishable Ct values over a small, non-representative sample. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 4, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@donnellymjd @apoorva_nyc @dzeitzoff I'm not missing it at all. It's a very important qualification. It's important enough, in fact, that it renders the apocalyptic tone of the article completely incongruent, which may be why Times *readers* clearly missed it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 4, 2021

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@donnellymjd @apoorva_nyc @dzeitzoff In addition to the statistical issues I've outlined, many experts think that Ct values are a poor proxy for transmissibility and the study certainly does not provide any sort of clinical proof of how often vaccinated people are transmitting. https://t.co/vsiLSH6RN4 — PolitiTweet.org

2. Did vaccines prevent spread among the infected? Don't know Study examined Ct values of symptomatic vaccinated… https://t.co/GRa7q9AKQw

Posted Aug. 4, 2021