Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 8, 2021

Created

Fri Jul 30 17:37:44 +0000 2021

Likes

393

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Of course it doesn't help when The New York Times takes some new (not yet public or peer-reviewed FWIW) study that says what I wrote above and frames it as some "harrowing new twist that upends everything we know about the coronavirus" or whatever. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 30, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@JamesSurowiecki Even that wouldn't necessarily be that informative because most people only come in for testing if they're symptomatic, and symptomatic breakthrough infections having high viral loads doesn't necessarily equate to all breakthrough infections having them. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 30, 2021

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Here, finally, is the Provincetown study, which includes several major caveats, most of which are almost completely missing from the hyperbolic news coverage around this. https://t.co/2psyPdVob6 https://t.co/VngcGG8HrP — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 30, 2021