Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 6, 2021

Created

Thu Dec 17 20:48:47 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

But if you're forecasting how the Rockets are going to do when both Harden + Russ are still in the lineup, that's less of a problem. Under RAPTOR, the errors literally cancel out. Thus, RAPTOR itself is a TEAM-BASED rating in certain respects, whereas PREDATOR isn't. 11/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 17, 2020

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

One issue with RAPTOR and other +/- systems is they can sometimes misallocate credit between teammates. So e.g. maybe they had Harden too high and Russell Westbrook too low. If you're forecasting how they'll do now that they're on separate teams, that could be a problem. 10/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 17, 2020

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

PREDATOR may nonetheless be better than RAPTOR for forecasting a player's performance in *future* seasons. But we were also using PREDATOR to account for a player's *in-season* performance and adjust his team's rating on that basis, when RAPTOR works better for that. 12/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 17, 2020