Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 25, 2020

Created

Fri Nov 13 16:21:59 +0000 2020

Likes

1,047

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

If it's important to convey the uncertainty in polling—and it is—I struggle to see how showing probabilities *isn't* an important part of the toolkit. With smart methods for both calculating those probabilities and placing them in context, of course. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2020

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

What's left out there? * 1.6m+ mail votes in NY that are going to be VERY blue. * ~1m votes elsewhere in the Northeast (MD/MA/NJ/DC) * ~1m in CA, though that includes provisionals so the # counted my be less. * Maybe 250k mail in IL, also very blue. * Bits & pieces elsewhere — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2020

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

But at some point talking about uncertainty without invoking probabilities is like trying to formulate sentences without using the word "the". — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2020