Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked July 15, 2020

Created

Wed Feb 19 17:46:05 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

The district-by-district forecasts were also underdispersed. That hurt candidates who projected to get <15% statewide, but who were potentially strong in some districts and thereby could expect to pick up some district delegates. 5/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

So, for example, the model now has Biden doing better than before in South Carolina and Alabama, but Sanders doing better than he was before in Nevada and California. 4/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

The fact that you can pick up district delegates even in states where you don't get 15% statewide makes it slightly harder for candidates to win by runaway delegate margins. So reintroducing the proper amount of district-by-district variance tends to help "no majority". 6/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 19, 2020 Hibernated