Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked July 15, 2020

Created

Wed Feb 19 17:46:04 +0000 2020

Likes

121

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

So, for example, the model now has Biden doing better than before in South Carolina and Alabama, but Sanders doing better than he was before in Nevada and California. 4/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Without demographics the model basically defaulted to a geographic prior, which tends to underrate Biden/Bloomberg in the South and overrate them (especially Biden) outside the South. It also tended to overrate Sanders in Southern states and underrate him in Western states. 3/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

The district-by-district forecasts were also underdispersed. That hurt candidates who projected to get <15% statewide, but who were potentially strong in some districts and thereby could expect to pick up some district delegates. 5/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 19, 2020 Hibernated