Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 91 of 162.
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
4 inconvenient facts for the Democrat impeachment fantasy: - Call transcript shows zero link between aid and political investigations - Aid was released WITHOUT any new investigations - Ukraine didn’t know aid was withheld during the call - Trump/Zelensky both say: zero pressure — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @GOPoversight: .@RepAdamSchiff's sham #impeachment hearings begin today. But make no mistake, Democrats have been out to get the Presi… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @ByronYork: Watch them turn on Mueller. Used to be a hero--how dare you criticize him! Now, he's a loser. 'Handcuffed himself...lack of… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Today, Washington Democrats finally begin the public phase of another unfounded and unserious attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election. And today, we stand up to stop it. It won’t happen. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Up to this point, the Democrats impeachment effort has failed deeply on two fronts: process and substance. Democrats have shown you the process already—it’s disastrous, secretive, and disorganized. Tomorrow, you’ll see more on their lack of substance. They don’t have a case. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @dcexaminer: "The Democrats do not have a serious case... This is a fantasy." -- @RepMarkMeadows on impeachment https://t.co/Oh2tKAJkR8 — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Over and over we’ve seen a consistent theme through witness interviews, from the people who actually talked to @realDonaldTrump: there was NO link between aid to Ukraine and political investigations. The Democrats do not have a serious case. This is a fantasy. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Over and over we’ve seen a consistent theme through witness interviews, from the people who actually talked to @realDonaldTrump all say: there was NO link between aid to Ukraine and political investigations. The Democrats do not have a serious case. This is a fantasy. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @MZHemingway: Fascinating to watch much of media’s quick turn from mocking notion of deep state into a full throated “Hell yes there’s a… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @CongressmanHice: Lots of noise but here are the facts: ➡️The call transcript speaks for itself— there was no quid pro quo ➡️Schiff ha… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepJeffDuncan: This is an important piece— “1)Beyond his opinions, he had few new facts to offer. 2)Vindman withheld important inform… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
"Democrats have a Colonel Vindman problem" https://t.co/WLIrXETyIv — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @GOPoversight: Schiff's Sham Impeachment. https://t.co/pmLfx30YZL — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Still very interesting how Washington Democrats and some in the media kept demanding to hear from the whistleblower—and yet the moment the potential coordination between the informant and Adam Schiff became public, the whistleblower was “no longer relevant” — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
This will go well with the evidence of “Russian collusion” we also heard about — PolitiTweet.org
Face The Nation @FaceTheNation
NEWS: @RepSwalwell tells @margbrennan that the House Intelligence Committee has evidence of an “extortion scheme.”… https://t.co/9BSxrvsIRO
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Thank you to all of America’s incredible Veterans who answered the call to defend our country—and to those who continue to fight for us daily. We owe you a debt of gratitude forever. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
If Chairman Adam Schiff and Democrats are denying GOP impeachment witnesses to prevent a “sham process,” they’re certainly too late—because that’s exactly what these last 6 weeks of House Democrat’s attempted impeachment have been. A sham. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @HomelandGOP: Democrats are so obsessed with impeaching President Trump that they're doing nothing to fix real problems Americans care a… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Setting aside the absurdity of these restrictions—note that the Democrats won't even be able to stay within their own parameters. The first two witnesses they're calling have never even talked to POTUS. They have zero firsthand knowledge. How can they speak to his motive? — PolitiTweet.org
Kyle Cheney @kyledcheney
BREAKING: SCHIFF details questions that witnesses must speak to in order to be considered relevant to impeachment h… https://t.co/uCwuufjfVr
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Folks, if someone tells you Gordon Sondland affirmed quid pro quo, you’re being lied to. He didn’t say this. He said he *did not know* what happened, but he began to *assume* aid was tied to an anti-corruption statement President Trump corrected Sondland on this, shortly after — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
No, he didn't. This is wrong. He explicitly testified he DID NOT KNOW this was the case, that it was his PRESUMPTION, and that he shared this ASSUMPTION with Ukraine. An assumption which, by the way, the President contradicted. (Sondland also affirmed the contradiction) — PolitiTweet.org
Zac Petkanas @Zac_Petkanas
For the love of God. GORDAN SONDLAND LITERALLY TESTIFIED THAT HE PERSONALLY TOLD THE UKRAINIANS THAT MILITARY AID… https://t.co/IXfqzrMbSe
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
This statement inadvertently gives you an inside look at how unserious and utterly baseless the Democrats' impeachment case against @realDonaldTrump is. They think it's an "abuse of power" to remove someone who explicitly serves at the pleasure of the President. — PolitiTweet.org
The Hill @thehill
Rep. Eric Swalwell: "It's an abuse of power to remove an ambassador for political reasons because you don't like wh… https://t.co/mXtnoK7W1h
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Just finished with Ambassador David Hale's testimony, the number 3 at the State Department and a distinguished public servant. He made a compelling case that there was absolutely no linkage between suspension of military aid and political investigations. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
While some repeat talking points about Ambassador Taylor's guesses and assumptions, read this simple section from John Ratcliffe. It destroys the quid pro quo narrative. Ukraine wasn't aware of a military hold during the 7/25 Trump-Zelensky call. You can't have a quid pro quo. https://t.co/vOOcOnMRHL — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
For Democrats seizing on the Sondland "assumption" update... Question: "And in no way, shape, or form in either the readouts from the United States or Ukraine did you receive any indication whatsoever for anything that resembles a quid pro quo?" Ambassador Volker: "Correct" https://t.co/6WHiQF0kH6 — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
You are being sold a false bill of goods—a fairy tale—by a group of people who want to take down this President by any means necessary, hook or crook. Americans will see through it. It won't work. @realDonaldTrump — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Set aside the complete lack of a deliverable and the fact that Ukraine wasn't even aware aid was being withheld till later. The notion that this was some sort of political 'quid pro quo' is not backed up by the facts. It is nonsense. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Gordon Sondland explained further: President Trump wanted Ukraine to root out corruption. “I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing... to do what he ran on” (clean up corruption.) https://t.co/LhD3jYbtog — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
You see a theme throughout these transcripts of the need to clean up corruption. Ambassador Yovanovitch laid it out: President Trump had a “deep rooted skepticism” about Ukraine corruption, and sending taxpayer funds to a corrupt nation. She shared the concern on corruption https://t.co/NAHXtGxl6w — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Question: "Did the President ever withhold a meeting with President Zelensky until the Ukrainians committed to investigating those (2016 election) allegations?" Ambassador Volker: "No... there was no linkage like that." https://t.co/acdEcdkdVY — PolitiTweet.org
