Mark Meadows

@MarkMeadows ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 16, 2019

Created

Thu Nov 07 18:56:44 +0000 2019

Likes

19,879

Retweets

8,470

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Folks, if someone tells you Gordon Sondland affirmed quid pro quo, you’re being lied to. He didn’t say this. He said he *did not know* what happened, but he began to *assume* aid was tied to an anti-corruption statement President Trump corrected Sondland on this, shortly after — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 7, 2019

Preceded By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

No, he didn't. This is wrong. He explicitly testified he DID NOT KNOW this was the case, that it was his PRESUMPTION, and that he shared this ASSUMPTION with Ukraine. An assumption which, by the way, the President contradicted. (Sondland also affirmed the contradiction) — PolitiTweet.org

For the love of God. GORDAN SONDLAND LITERALLY TESTIFIED THAT HE PERSONALLY TOLD THE UKRAINIANS THAT MILITARY AID… https://t.co/IXfqzrMbSe

Posted Nov. 7, 2019

Followed By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Setting aside the absurdity of these restrictions—note that the Democrats won't even be able to stay within their own parameters. The first two witnesses they're calling have never even talked to POTUS. They have zero firsthand knowledge. How can they speak to his motive? — PolitiTweet.org

BREAKING: SCHIFF details questions that witnesses must speak to in order to be considered relevant to impeachment h… https://t.co/uCwuufjfVr

Posted Nov. 7, 2019