Mark Meadows

@MarkMeadows ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 16, 2019

Created

Wed Nov 06 20:08:23 +0000 2019

Likes

5,199

Retweets

3,013

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

While some repeat talking points about Ambassador Taylor's guesses and assumptions, read this simple section from John Ratcliffe. It destroys the quid pro quo narrative. Ukraine wasn't aware of a military hold during the 7/25 Trump-Zelensky call. You can't have a quid pro quo. https://t.co/vOOcOnMRHL — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 6, 2019

Preceded By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

For Democrats seizing on the Sondland "assumption" update... Question: "And in no way, shape, or form in either the readouts from the United States or Ukraine did you receive any indication whatsoever for anything that resembles a quid pro quo?" Ambassador Volker: "Correct" https://t.co/6WHiQF0kH6 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 6, 2019

Followed By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Just finished with Ambassador David Hale's testimony, the number 3 at the State Department and a distinguished public servant. He made a compelling case that there was absolutely no linkage between suspension of military aid and political investigations. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 6, 2019