Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 368 of 504.
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @AlecMacGillis: "Essentially what the dollar stores are betting on in a large way is that we are going to have a permanent underclass in… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Right now, a greater % of Dems in Trump districts (3/12) are retiring than GOPers in Clinton districts (2/23). Will that change? — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@CookPolitical In other words, Democrats would need to win 33 of these 45 competitive races (73%) in order to win the House majority. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@Nate_Cohn I really doubt #CA50 will ever move beyond Likely R; an indicted Hunter would still be the favorite. Mee… https://t.co/G6Zs9JYnfr — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @Nate_Cohn: Some big moves here, including Rohrabacher, McSally to toss-up, KS-02 open to lean R, NY-11/KY-6 on the board at likely R. h… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
New: GOP Reps. Martha McSally #AZ02, Dana Rohrabacher #CA48, Rod Blum #IA01 move from Lean R to Toss Up. https://t.co/pRa54lLbUm — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Hot off the press: new @CookPolitical House Ratings feature 45 competitive races (36 GOP-held, 9 Dem-held). https://t.co/pRa54lLbUm — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
New @CookPolitical: House Ratings changes in 12 districts as Democrats gain candidates & momentum. https://t.co/ELJjxKPZJh — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @CookPolitical: NEW: Ratings changes in 12 districts as Democrats gain momentum Full story here: https://t.co/bv7dE7sCdh https://t.co/G… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
#NH01 remains in Toss Up @CookPolitical following Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D) retirement announcement. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Per PA law, Gov. Wolf (D) has 10 days to schedule a #PA18 special to be held no sooner than 60 days from proclamation. Parties choose cands. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@CookPolitical There's also evidence of added risk for incumbent party when special elections follow scandal. Think… https://t.co/lCEepExNd8 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Rep. Tim Murphy's resignation moves #PA18 from Solid Republican to Likely Republican @CookPolitical. R+11, but specials = more uncertainty. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Much as mathematicians solved the reapportionment puzzle in 1920s, it's now within our technological capabilities to resolve redistricting. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
More advantages: only one solution map possible & it could be computed/released immediately after each Census. No p… https://t.co/1O64JVfg6c — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Here's a standard that can fit in a tweet: Require use of an algorithm to draw shortest line(s) necessary to achieve equipopulous districts.
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@CTIronman True. The shortest-splitline part of the algorithm would address the R gerrymander. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
And to avoid dividing communities, require algorithm to limit county/city splits to the minimum necessary to achieve equipopulous districts. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Not that it's remotely in play in this SCOTUS case. But If you're a programmer and think you could write this algorithm, I'd love to talk. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Here's a standard that can fit in a tweet: Require use of an algorithm to draw shortest line(s) necessary to achieve equipopulous districts. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
If SCOTUS adopts the Efficiency Gap, these are just several questions that could be litigated ferociously in courts for many years to come. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Do you have to wait for an election to take place before invalidating a gerrymander? And what about Ds/Rs who defy their district's leans? — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Another layer of complexity: which elections do you use to calculate the gap? The most recent cycle? Most recent 5 cycles? Cong/pres? — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Terrific explanation of the Efficiency Gap's pros/cons. A real con: it has a hard time telling what's gerrymanderin… https://t.co/pY9JLXiR30 — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
How the new sociological gobbledegook of gerrymandering works https://t.co/UZl2H5snoJ
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @Nate_Cohn: How the new sociological gobbledegook of gerrymandering works https://t.co/UZl2H5snoJ — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Just think of all the $$$/grief everyone could have saved by not going through #GA06. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Why Retirements May Hold the Key in Whether Republicans Can Keep the House https://t.co/tPVW5DwTVK — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
[new article] Why Virginia's Delegate Races Could Be the Most Telling 2017 Elections @CookPolitical https://t.co/cujjk6yBrc — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Terrific job by @galendruke and the @FiveThirtyEight podcast team on the 1st gerrymandering podcast episode: https://t.co/jeSozvNp64 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
https://t.co/IYaxHyf0aL — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @amyewalter: Polls show Ds w/ enthusiasm advantage for '18, but may be wasting it in CDs they already hold https://t.co/yhpzcszfcP — PolitiTweet.org
