Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 273 of 504.
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Yup — PolitiTweet.org
David A. Hopkins @DaveAHopkins
Gary Jacobson pronounces the incumbency advantage dead in congressional general elections; finds ~2-point bump for… https://t.co/fA6j073rtT
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @ClareMalone: This definitely seems like the intuitive way for Biden to handle the recent allegations—to convey to people that he's old… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Perhaps cautious is a better word than skeptical, as in: I don't doubt the accuracy of these early polls at all; ju… https://t.co/aGo4DkDRf6 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Not to mention: women fairly consistently outperformed pre-election polls/expectations in 2018 Dem congressional primaries. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The biggest reason I'm skeptical of early '20 Dem primary polls: white dudes combining for ~63% support in a diverse party that made clear in '18 that its preferred way to send a message to Trump is to send a woman. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Projection: today is the first day in history Americans have elected more than 100 women to the U.S. House of representatives.
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
There’s a deal to be struck here: FL gives everything west of Tallahassee to AL so that Trump gets Gaetz in the Sen… https://t.co/uF5U97oStz — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @databyler: New piece up on white non-college educated *Democrats* Basically 1) There are waaaaaaay more of them than many think 2)… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Had so much fun getting oriented @UChiPolitics today & meeting fellow Spring 2019 Pritzker Fellows @JohnBKing… https://t.co/uvXZnWS9VL — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @katherinemiller: Friends, Do you hear that? Listen closely. That faint tick-tick-tick is the sound of a bomb, inside your heart, that… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @OryxMaps: Its a little late, so I'm going to give a full shoutout tomorrow, but all of #ElectionTwitter should check out https://t.co/0… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Hell*uva*game #FinalFourBound — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@Ed_Realist https://t.co/3Lt9PsPcu6 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The idea that Northam/Fairfax scandals are going to make VA voters like Trump more is about as nuts as the scandals themselves. VA is basically an amalgam of all his worst demographics...(except maybe Mormons). — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
I’ll buy this when FFX/ARL/ALX capsize into the Potomac. https://t.co/2a3iqNI2fv — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Don’t care who we played, 53-49 is a great UVA score line — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@galendruke p.s. I'm in Fargo right now and all of my North Dakotan friends are now wondering about Andrew Yang's position on merging the Dakotas cc: @NateSilver538 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@PoliticsWolf Stephen- I'd be grateful to meet you sometime and discuss race & redistricting. It's a complex subject, there's a lot of ground to cover & Twitter probably isn't the most constructive place to start. -Dave — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Just finished listening, and this is as high-level a discussion about the promise & challenges of applying stats to… https://t.co/2fZnggrD18 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Politics Podcast: Can Statistics Solve Gerrymandering? @NateSilver538 & @GalenDruke sit down w/ Prof. Moon Duchin o… https://t.co/0JVP9…
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
@galendruke Ouch (ok fine, this might be nerdier than any of ours) — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Politics Podcast: Can Statistics Solve Gerrymandering? @NateSilver538 & @GalenDruke sit down w/ Prof. Moon Duchin of Tufts. https://t.co/gj6r8SIdLd — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
See: Buttigieg. Agree w/ @NateSilver538 that the press coverage (almost all glowing) is finally catching up to th… https://t.co/PcKeCN2G60 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
This much is clear in the early going: the same type of anti-DC/established politician yearning that dominated the… https://t.co/RgxHm2ZWT6 — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The Dem primary is wide open, but nowhere is that more true than the black South. Here’s why: 1) There’s no Dem from there (so far) 2) It’s got an ton of delegates 3) Of all top contenders, Biden’s support is softest/most based on name ID, and he’s dominating early polls there — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Yeah, Dems won more House votes than Rs in Iowa in 2018, but a big part of that is named Steve King. Could a Dem win IA in 2020? Sure, but they'd have already won MI/PA/WI, which is why IA's not really close to being "decisive." — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
And sorry, CO/VA (exit stage left) and IA/OH (exit stage right) are no longer swing states. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The five states that will decide Trump's fate in 2020: MI, PA, WI, FL, AZ. White working-class voters dominate media portrayals of the first three, but the key variable common to the first four? African-American enthusiasm/turnout. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Interesting juxtaposition. I agree w/ the "18-29/black turnout" majority in the second poll...which is why I'm not… https://t.co/0qRMVfhVLD — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Remember, when it comes down to it, the two groups who will decide Dems' 2020 nominee: 1) African-Americans 2) suburban women. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Being 1) young 2) African-American 3) female 4) not "of DC" 5) from the South would give Abrams *big* upside in a D… https://t.co/tR2JT5Wsjj — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
That today's NC Rs are able to draw more effective AND better-looking partisan gerrymanders than '90s NC Ds isn't a testament to tech. Rather, increased voter self-sorting since '90s has made it *much* easier to draw lopsided districts. — PolitiTweet.org
Angela Gillette @gillette_girl
@Redistrict I’d argue that the post 2010 map is way more powerful though - anything created since then takes advanc… https://t.co/47oCpfTuR2