Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 238 of 504.
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The candidates blindly waiting to claim victory feel like tonight’s losers — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
These jokes are so canned but tbh the entertainment/content bar has never been lower than tonight — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Klobuchar wise to seize the stage before everyone goes to bed. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
My hat’s off to the dean of IA political journalists, @DavidYepsen, who presciently predicted when we were teaching at @UChiPolitics last spring that Dems’ new bells and whistles would create a results reporting mess. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Lower than expected turnout, muddled outcome...this IA caucus script is shaping up pretty well for Trump. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The geographic/socioeconomic breadth of Buttigieg’s support, based on limited results, is quite a bit higher than my priors. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The final sentence of this @amyewalter IA dispatch from last week pretty much nailed it. https://t.co/MBSKvnd8Ga — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Let’s just fast-forward to the floor fight in Milwaukee? — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
This kind of thing not uncommon tonight. https://t.co/SwQfw8yfhS — PolitiTweet.org
Trip Gabriel @tripgabriel
A tale of 2 precincts in Dubuque caucusing in the same middle school produced radically different results on 1st co… https://t.co/jnRWoAQf0u
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Nightmare November scenario: Electoral College winner hinges on AZ, which takes week to count late-counted ballots that skew blue. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
You can expect a lot more of this from Trump camp in months to come... — PolitiTweet.org
Brad Parscale - Text TRUMP to 88022 @parscale
Quality control = rigged? 🤔 https://t.co/rJY3gdRccE
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @ellawinthrop: feels somehow significant I'm going to know the outcome of this rose ceremony before i know the winner of the Iowa caucus — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
In retrospect...was the “Spiked Selzer” (h/t @NateSilver538) the most accurate final caucus poll yet? — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Not necessarily one of them, but IA caucus detractors are gaining new talking points by the minute. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Still early, but so far not a spectacular night for Elizabeth Warren. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Places I’d really like to know what’s going on: Mason City, Ottumwa, Burlington, Council Bluffs, Ft. Dodge, etc. If you’ve got a report from the ground, let’s hear it. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
At this point it would be much more valuable to hear from some caucus sites that aren’t DSM/Iowa City. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @laurenpeikoff: .@SteveKornacki just read a statement from the Iowa State Democratic Party on @MSNBC -- the party says it's doing "quali… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @TVietor08: Final count Ankeny 09 precinct Amy - 51 (+8) Warren - 71 (+14) Bernie - 80 (+3) Pete - 75 (+12) — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
The best possible outcome for Biden now might be a total muddle at the top w/ other candidates fighting for weeks over who “won.” And that is...very possible. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @natashakorecki: Here at precinct 316 in West Des Moines, Amy Klobuchar reaches viability — 56 needed for viable. Bernie is not viable h… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Klobuchar turning in a better performance than her polling would’ve suggested so far. It just might not be enough to crack the top four. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Pete Buttigieg is putting up some impressive numbers, including in some smaller/less urban counties. His supporters ought to be cautiously optimistic. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Final count in Johnston 4: Buttigieg 123 (3 county delegates) Warren 93 (3) Klobuchar 80 (2) Biden 62 (2) https://t.co/xtumh2ljrw — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Johnston, IA precinct 4 - need 57 to be viable (via family member at caucus): Buttigieg 107 Klobuchar 74 Warren 64… https://t.co/w2c4fA7BV1
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
RT @jmartNYT: .@JoeBiden not viable in a Davenport precinct where Atl Mayor @KeishaBottoms was dispatched, via uga ace @bluestein on the sc… — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Warren needs more precincts like this. Not a bad showing for Klobuchar (for Iowa City) either. https://t.co/GKkYdsyz3N — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McDonald @ElectProject
Unofficial here at Iowa City 1 first preference vote Biden 51 Warren 228 klobuchar 110 Sanders 125 Buttigieg 102 Ya… https://t.co/Ej4kcMV8ZT
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Easy to imagine Biden finishing outside the top three in initial preference totals but doing better w/ delegate equivalents - owing to huge college town crowds for other candidates but better rural/small town Biden viability. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Plus, a Biden finish in top three tonight would probably be a decent showing for him at this point. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Reality check for those calling IA a “Biden implosion:” this caucus is totally unrepresentative of larger Dem primary electorate. Why? 1. It’s a caucus (unlike 90% of contests), rewarding passion on left 2. 90%+ white 3. Really young (21% under 35) All of Biden’s worst things. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Johnston, IA precinct 4 - need 57 to be viable (via family member at caucus): Buttigieg 107 Klobuchar 74 Warren 64… https://t.co/w2c4fA7BV1 — PolitiTweet.org
