Dave Wasserman

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Johnston, IA precinct 4 - need 57 to be viable (via family member at caucus): Buttigieg 107 Klobuchar 74 Warren 64… https://t.co/w2c4fA7BV1 — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

RT @kasie: Thanks for watching!! Hanging out all night with @chucktodd and the best political team in the business — join us wherever you s… — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Per family member in Johnston (Des Moines burbs): “Pete’s looking good, Amy and warren too... Bernie is looking pretty solid but joe is a little lighter than I would have thought.” https://t.co/DJvkpsjFZk — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Widespread reports of Joe Biden barely/not viable in types of precincts he should be to have any type of chance. Having a hard time seeing him in top three...long way to go. — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

RT @PeterHamby: Biden people in Clive high-fiving because they hit viability threshold by ONE person. One woman screamed “CARTER” at some d… — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

RT @ClareMalone: We can confirm the final results of the unreleased Iowa Poll: Sanders 22% Warren 18% Buttigieg 16% Biden 13% https:… — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

RT @Nate_Cohn: Most of you know that there are *four* different sets of results this year. They could all split. https://t.co/CZTc4mb0cg — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

For example, Warren likely to do really well in Iowa City (college+ libs). I’d expect Buttigieg to do well in weste… https://t.co/mfwcwl7Sg4 — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

The candidates with the most on the line tonight: Warren, Buttigieg and Klobuchar. Their support skews college+ (esp. Warren), and that could prevent them from hitting 15% in less college-educated precincts (i.e. most of the state). — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

I’d expect Biden to have the next most broad geographic support, w/ important exceptions in the liberal college pre… https://t.co/rhAhfKYguZ — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Lot of uncertainty heading into tonight. One thing I’m fairly confident of: the only candidate in position to be above the brutal 15% threshold virtually everywhere in Iowa is Bernie. — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

RT @katie_akin: First alignment at Drake Fieldhouse underway. BIG Sanders group. Followed in size order by Warren, Buttigieg, Yang (3) and… — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

The current state of the primaries begs the question "How do Dems avoid a contested convention?" just as much as it… https://t.co/LY7FANZopH — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

If you're wondering why Dems are still favorites to hold the House majority (even tho 30 of them sit in Trump districts)... — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

I’d go further: one candidate will need to expand substantially beyond their current coalition for Dems to avoid a Milwaukee dumpster 🔥 — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Yeah, this is going to end well https://t.co/DlTgdBPMLZ — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Great read by @emilymbadger: https://t.co/etQSB2AZKi — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

RT @JMilesColeman: RIP to one of the most important memes in Election Twitter history https://t.co/OZzP3Z3NXO — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Major pet peeve: people using 2018-9 results to argue that a state is “trending blue” in 2020. First, remember to check how predictive 2008-2010 red swings were in key 2012 states. — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Have to disagree w/ claims IA is a swing state this fall. Given its enormous non-college white share (and 9% Trump margin), if the Dem nominee is competitive in IA, he/she is already easily winning all the other Midwestern states needed to win. https://t.co/ppkhUH6Ras — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

RT @ClareMalone: My interview w/@staceyabrams. We talked not just her presidential decisions, but her thoughts on the VP speculation abt he… — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

If you've ever been to an IA caucus, most of the intrigue is in the horsetrading but it's easy to imagine 2020 topping them all in that regard. — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

RT @kkondik: Those hoping for Klo-mentum in Iowa: Santorum came on strong eight years ago at the end, providing a template for Klobuchar. F… — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

If you haven’t listened to this @ShaneGoldmacher dispatch from SW PA, you’re missing out on the best piece of journ… https://t.co/wIuK3yTRsO — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

RT @ellawinthrop: incredibly proud to be a minuscule part of this project (I did one (1) interview). please take a read or a listen, the st… — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

This is setting up a dynamic similar to 2016: Biden could easily plod his way to the nomination thanks to older voters, but appear to have much less enthusiastic support than Sanders b/c older voters don’t show up at rallies as much - fueling distrust/conspiracies on the left. — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Biden at 3% w/ 18-34 but in the lead overall is something to behold. — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Impeachment trial politics in a nutshell: Median district of Dem impeachment managers: 38.7% white, Clinton +49.8%… https://t.co/zJaUkWh4Wl — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Beating a dead horse, but it still boggles my mind that no one with a similar profile (female natsec/political outsider) is running for POTUS after what we saw in 2018. — PolitiTweet.org

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

100% agree Amy McGrath would have had a better chance to win the presidency than she has to defeat Mitch McConnell in a Trump +30 state. — PolitiTweet.org