Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet interface.

Showing page 569 of 729.

Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@davidshor @Wertwhile @naufalsanaullah @conorsen @JoeGodwin otoh, a party trying to win the swing vote of rich area… https://t.co/e0C4hEQj1c — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

RT @Phillibustering: @Nate_Cohn I've seen it before, cc: @ACLU https://t.co/al6bWJ0ftI — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Retweet Deleted after 5 years Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

I don't know that I've seen this before--a check mark, too https://t.co/nvyEz3sOIs — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

No new GA-6 take from me--these thoughts from 3 weeks ago still hold. Not surprising that it's competitive https://t.co/morSqwhgZA — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Well, hope you're excited to do this all over again in two months. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Ossoff now at 48.3 percent with 189k reporting. 25 precincts, ~11k votes left — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

They turned out like they did https://t.co/lC7BDpWNre — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Adding all the candidates together: R 50.49, D 49.41 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

It's possible there are ~1500 heavily Democratic mail-in ballots that aren't included (haven't checked), but not enough to avoid a runoff. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

There's around 15k GOP-leaning vote left. I'd guess that brings him down to around 47.7 when it's all through. https://t.co/E6gk3b7Ndr — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Big update puts Ossoff at 48.6 percent with 183k votes counted. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

... https://t.co/OXxGqEZ5LR — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

RT @conorsen: I-85 now only the second-most broken piece of infrastructure in Fulton County. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Retweet Deleted Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

We didn't care about it at the time, but Georgia was pretty bad in November as well https://t.co/CU80IV1faz — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Come on, Fulton. I'm going to get a beer — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@Redistrict @conorsen Fulton's mail vote looks basically the same as DeKalb — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@Redistrict @conorsen that will probably net ossoff something near 1000 votes, maybe more — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@conorsen sorry, i meant at least in dekalb — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@conorsen i think the mail-in vote is in--at least in Fulton. But it's extremely Democratic, more so than the IPEV — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@conorsen are those not counted? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Cobb is done. Ossoff at 50.3% with 55k in Fulton County left. Our guess he gets 45%; needs 49. Seems small, but ver… https://t.co/ySclJaXDZH — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Here's the vote counted and our estimate for what's left (Fulton) https://t.co/l38T7ISTj5 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

That's getting in the range where it's worth checking in on the cumulative .8 percent going to non-Ossoff Democrats. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

I don't know if I noticed when this happened, but Ossoff at 48.7 percent in our estimate--which is a little higher than it has been/was — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@PatrickRuffini i kind of took the opposite lesson on this one — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@rkahne at this point the main reason i don't is bc of tweets like this — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@stormforceman21 these are completed areas — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Also possible that Handel is making bigger inroads into Ossoff in Fulton than elsewhere, in which case he could fall further. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

One reason I don't think Ossoff crashes into the mid-40s: I'd expect a smaller eday/early split in Fulton, bc of worse Ossoff early vote — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

I don't see this. What are you seeing? Ossoff is generally ahead of Clinton in completed areas… https://t.co/1jE7L5T2V3 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 19, 2017 Hibernated