Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 107 of 729.
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Back in February I drew this map just to get a sense of what might happen, and it scores quite similarly despite some relevant differences (they care less about county lines than this supposes, for one thing) https://t.co/3oz2NOGvu2 — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
I'm a bit late to this (moved yesterday), but I am surprised that there's outrage about this map. This Colorado proposal more-or-less comports with all of the various standards for partisan fairness. A mean-median gap of ~1 pt is pretty fair? https://t.co/J1rHN0Onls — PolitiTweet.org
Josh Kraushaar @HotlineJosh
Dems pan proposed Colorado redistricting map - POLITICO https://t.co/UlahJimEFp
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
The demise of HR1 may wind up opening the door to more plausible, if still quite unlikely, paths to reform https://t.co/NeefmyawYF — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
RT @rickhasen: #ELB: “A Bill Destined to Fail May Now Spawn More Plausible Options” https://t.co/K44CR0kad3 smart @Nate_Cohn — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
The Democratic Electorate on Twitter Is Not the Actual Democratic Electorate https://t.co/kBGZMYSwyW — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
RT @jmartNYT: As @ericadamsfornyc builds a lead in NYC - the day before Biden delivers his first speech on rising crime - a number of Dems… — PolitiTweet.org
Katie Glueck @katieglueck
. @ericadamsfornyc statement on the @AOC - @mayawiley endorsement. This race is wild! https://t.co/IZyT3gc3nd
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Based on the pre-election polls (which seem to doing well in the first round of balloting), it is hard to see Garcia/Wiley pulling this off, even after several weeks of not-so-instant runoff voting. But at this point, the first step is a big, surprise showing in the absentee vt — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Adams now leads by more than 9 points and that will probably keep growing as long as Election Day votes are being counted (he's probably leading the eday vote by 15 so far). Once that's done, Garcia/Wiley can at least hope to pull Adams back a bit in the late absentee count — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
certainly the threat of ending McCarthy's district would be more leverage than anything the Dems have today — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
It's interesting to imagine what this redistricting cycle--and the prospects for redistricting reform--would look like if Democrats had full control over redistricting in the states where they've handed over power to nonpartisan commissions, like CA https://t.co/oAt6DzPALd — PolitiTweet.org
Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
Losing candidates in NYC's RCV are going to be as angry as Staten Island being put in the same congressional distri… https://t.co/58UuA8Q6Ox
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
The NYC mayoral primary results page is live. Be sure to check back in a few weeks for the final result https://t.co/6rkkWSJUIz — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
RT @AlexThomp: Tough DMR/Selzer poll in Iowa for Biden. In March: more Iowans approved of the job was doing as president (47%) than disapp… — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@bengrossbg @elkmovie it'll count. but you would just risk elevating a candidate who would lose to adams. — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@elkmovie with the risk being that voting for your preferred but unelectable candidate, you wind up with adams — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@elkmovie it'll count either way. but if you're an anyone-but-adams voter, then it might make sense to rank the candidate who is likeliest to beat adams (whoever that might be), even if that candidate is not your preferred choice — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@elkmovie it'll count either way. but if you're an anyone-but-adams voter, then it might not make sense to vote for a candidate who would be likeliest to lose to adams (whoever that might be), even if that candidate's your preferred choice — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
A lot of people don't think there's any strategic voting in ranked choice, but if either Wiley or Garcia seemed positioned to beat Adams one-on-one, but not the other, there would be a strategic case for progressives to rank that candidate first even if they preferred the other — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
Garcia doing only slightly better than Wiley in the one-on-one matchup with Adams. Doubt that's anywhere near a clear enough result to prompt any kind of late strategic voting https://t.co/ym2Odumam9 — PolitiTweet.org
Fairvote Action @FairVoteAction
In addition to leading in the initial RCV tally, Eric Adams is a strong favorite against every other candidate head… https://t.co/s7fkFDm7s9
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
RT @FairVoteAction: In addition to leading in the initial RCV tally, Eric Adams is a strong favorite against every other candidate head-to-… — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
RT @sahilkapur: New @MonmouthPoll on VOTING -71% say make early voting easier (16% say make it harder) -50% say make mail voting easier (… — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
RT @awprokop: As @SeanTrende points out a lot of people argue both that the GOP is a terrifying extremist party, and that Dems have little… — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@jon_m_rob @ProfNickStephan yeah, this is the sort of conversation that needed to happen in january and at this point it would be extremely tough to decouple it from the charged fight over voter suppression v voting rights. but i'm not 100% sure it's too late on some of the easiest stuff — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
RT @axios: .@jonathanvswan presses Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan on why he’s outspoken against Islamophobia in the West but silent abo… — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
RT @Redistrict: Once again, a major news outlet's headline omits the rather important detail that *every* state routinely removes moved/ina… — PolitiTweet.org
CNN Politics @CNNPolitics
Georgia removes 100,000 names from voter registration rolls https://t.co/b3RkgkUPl4
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
RT @perrybaconjr: Remember that The Intercept YESTERDAY published the details of a closed-door meeting in which Manchin cast Blunt as a nic… — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Here's Blunt's quote When “Stacey Abrams immediately endorsed Sen. Manchin’s proposal, it became the Stacey Abrams… https://t.co/Dek69Pr7fI
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@ParkerMolloy @HeerJeet and that's been my only, narrow point from the very start: the unusual thing about this debate is that there was never a term to describe an incredibly important web of ideas. and without a term, the right gave it one — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@ParkerMolloy @HeerJeet i never said it made their points valid or making things illegal better. never said anything like it. all i've said is that the reason we're having this semantic labeling debate is because there was no term previously, and i think that's an unusual feature of this debate — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@ParkerMolloy @HeerJeet now you might not consider that very interesting or important! which it's not. but my tweet was, again, weighing in only on this narrow change — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@ParkerMolloy @HeerJeet no, there is something new: the characterization of this as CRT, and the subsequent muddling of what's actually being debated and contested — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn
@ParkerMolloy @HeerJeet i honestly haven't really considered this question before this, but without having thought about it i can imagine a real case to ban all sorts of ideas from being taught in public school--biological white supremacy, young earth, flat earth, whatever https://t.co/SXRBsjL3aI — PolitiTweet.org