Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @SethAbramson: (📢) Missed the release of PROOF OF COUP, the fourth book in the NYT-bestselling Proof series, last weekend? Just click be… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @leonardkl: A federal judge suspended enforcement of Florida's "Stop WOKE Act," a DeSantis-backed law restricting how workplaces and sch… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE7) The Trumpists must be taught that *every act of misconduct* will be met with a *greater* degree of—entirely legal and within-bounds—aggressiveness by DOJ. These lawless cretins know no other rule than the rule of power. And DOJ has plenty of power and authority to expend. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE6) The DOJ is learning how lawless those it is dealing with are. Doxxing, threats, selective leaks, political rhetoric that ignores rule of law and precedent, altered images of the judge, actual violence. DOJ must be America’s lion, now—and that means moving to indict Trump. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@reneecle Those threats are exactly what he must *not* consider—else he rewards them. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@NotTrumplican See the thread — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@theloganshow See the thread — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@waynepoopsinAK See the thread — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@ClarenceGaines2 See the thread — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE5) Maybe it works out. Maybe DOJ suggests redactions, the court rules they make the document incoherent—or in some way unfair to Trump—and decides that the whole thing must be kept sealed. But *every time* we deviate from normal course of business we weaken the rule of law. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE4) I look at the case and compare it to cases that don’t involve politics—and see a chasm. Non-lawyers, I do understand, will look at this decision in a vacuum (Did the judge grant the media outlets’ demands entirely? No? Then it’s a win for DOJ). Two different perspectives. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE3) ...the risk of angering the judge, who’s made clear he wants the affidavit released in some form, will likely make DOJ timid in suggesting its redactions, meaning that it may not seek all the redactions it could (after all, it wanted *none* of the affidavit released yet). — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE2) I am happy to see—quite honestly!—that there is still optimism in the readers of this feed, who are saying that DOJ being able to seek redactions means this is a win for the DOJ. What I am saying is that in a normal case the motion would simply have been denied. Also... — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE) This thread replies to the breaking news below. While DOJ will be able to seek some redactions, that it’s even having to jump through such hoops at this stage in its investigation is extraordinary—and is being done solely to appease Trump and the GOP, both of them lawless. https://t.co/0mS5UARKQJ — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS) If you or I were the party whose premises had been searched in this case, the judge would have laughed in our faces at the notion that this affidavit would be released before prosecutors wanted it to be. Politics poisons our criminal justice system—not the other way around. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

This country continues to appease Trump to its ruin. This case may have been brought—irresponsibly—by media outlets and Judicial Watch, but the GOP wanted this affidavit released to destroy the case against Trump. And the judge is giving them their wish. https://t.co/eOSTzJ1TVQ — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @SethAbramson: (📢) Missed the release of PROOF OF COUP, the fourth book in the NYT-bestselling Proof series, last weekend? Just click be… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS3) In the recent PROOF OF COUP Q&A I was asked if any member of Congress is looking at potential legal liability for their actions before January 6. The answer is that a dozen members of the House Freedom Caucus have potential legal liability—Louie Gohmert foremost among them. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS2) A growing body of evidence suggests the Waldron Plot was presented in the Oval Office on December 21, 2020, with Gohmert present. As PROOF has written, it was shortly after this key meeting that Gohmert pursued a lawsuit intended to get SCOTUS to overturn the 2020 election. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS) Louie Gohmert is a key figure in PROOF OF COUP, as he was the earliest adopter of a pre-election conspiracy theory—undergirded by fake data—intended to justify Donald Trump stealing the 2020 election. The theory soon birthed the Waldron Plot, a coup plot at the Pentagon. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@bunsonh It’s being released on Substack, and can be accessed with a $5 monthly or $50 annual subscription to the PROOF substack (which has scores and scores of other reports). Those with an Apple phone can read it via the Substack app, though it is equally viewable via any web browser. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Louie Gohmert is a leading insurrectionist. He supported Russell Ramsland’s conspiracy theories even before they evolved into Phil Waldron’s dastardly Pentagon coup plot. He should absolutely spend the next 5 years under aggressive federal investigation. https://t.co/YekPKAmsgj — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @thedailybeast: BREAKING: Brian Stelter will depart CNN, The Daily Beast has confirmed, as the the network will cancel his weekly media… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(📢) Missed the release of PROOF OF COUP, the fourth book in the NYT-bestselling Proof series, last weekend? Just click below to access this 250-page exposé—full of shocking breaking news—about the January 6 coup plot at the Pentagon. (And please RETWEET!) https://t.co/Du7n9v5w34 — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Instead, Weisselberg will do 100 days in jail and offer no meaningful cooperation. Because he is rich. Because he is white. Because he is connected to powerful people. Because, for reasons no one in government has explained to us or will ever explain to us, Trump is “protected.” — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

In the courts I’ve practiced in, with a 75-year-old defendant who’s been committing crimes for years and has been part of a much larger criminal conspiracy, prosecutors would have said this to Weisselberg: “You can cooperate or die in prison. We have nothing else to say to you.” — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

I’ve no doubt whatsoever that some of those who blinked in pursuing justice for Donald Trump (like Mueller) are good folks. But how we respond to Trump in this moment is a test of character for all of us—all Americans, not just prosecutors—and if you fail that test, you fail it. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

America is marching into authoritarianism within the next 10 years, and it’s prosecutors like Alvin Bragg and—sad to say—Mueller, along with all national GOP pols, whose names should be damned for taking us there. Even Garland let Trump off the hook for *12 Obstruction felonies*. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

The cost of prosecutors coddling Trump—not to mention the whole Republican Party covering for him—is an unambiguous evil: witnesses afraid to come forward against him because they can see as the rest of us can that this career criminal and serial sexual assailant is “protected.” — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Understand that it’s factually inarguable that Donald Trump has been treated *far better* over the course of his lifetime than any defendant in modern American history. Every single prosecutor in a position to hold him accountable has blinked as if *terrified* of doing their job. — PolitiTweet.org