Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 25, 2022

Created

Thu Aug 18 20:58:41 +0000 2022

Likes

281

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE3) ...the risk of angering the judge, who’s made clear he wants the affidavit released in some form, will likely make DOJ timid in suggesting its redactions, meaning that it may not seek all the redactions it could (after all, it wanted *none* of the affidavit released yet). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 18, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE2) I am happy to see—quite honestly!—that there is still optimism in the readers of this feed, who are saying that DOJ being able to seek redactions means this is a win for the DOJ. What I am saying is that in a normal case the motion would simply have been denied. Also... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 18, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE4) I look at the case and compare it to cases that don’t involve politics—and see a chasm. Non-lawyers, I do understand, will look at this decision in a vacuum (Did the judge grant the media outlets’ demands entirely? No? Then it’s a win for DOJ). Two different perspectives. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 18, 2022