Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 25, 2022

Created

Thu Aug 18 20:57:36 +0000 2022

Likes

434

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE2) I am happy to see—quite honestly!—that there is still optimism in the readers of this feed, who are saying that DOJ being able to seek redactions means this is a win for the DOJ. What I am saying is that in a normal case the motion would simply have been denied. Also... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 18, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE) This thread replies to the breaking news below. While DOJ will be able to seek some redactions, that it’s even having to jump through such hoops at this stage in its investigation is extraordinary—and is being done solely to appease Trump and the GOP, both of them lawless. https://t.co/0mS5UARKQJ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 18, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(NOTE3) ...the risk of angering the judge, who’s made clear he wants the affidavit released in some form, will likely make DOJ timid in suggesting its redactions, meaning that it may not seek all the redactions it could (after all, it wanted *none* of the affidavit released yet). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 18, 2022