Dave Wasserman

@Redistrict ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked June 2, 2021

Created

Fri Jul 24 19:54:40 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

First, we should note that Marist's Oct/Nov 2018 polls were fairly precise even if there was a chronic pro-D *inaccuracy:* MO: McCaskill +3 (actual result -6) IN: Donnelly +3 (-6) AZ: Sinema +6 (+2) FL: Nelson +4 (-0.2) TN: Bredesen -5 (-11) MN: Walz +17 (+12) WI: Evers +10 (+1) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 24, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

I applaud Marist for indeed being one of the most transparent pollsters out there when it comes to its sampling. It also allows us, like Marist, to study what might have led to a chronic pro-D bias in Oct/Nov 2018 polls... 1/ — PolitiTweet.org

@Redistrict @Nate_Cohn @gelliottmorris Before rushing to judgment, we are one of few polls completely transparen… https://t.co/jZeB39xyuX

Posted July 24, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

What's one thing these surveys had in common? In all seven cases, non-college whites were seriously under-sampled relative to their share of the actual electorate based on estimates using Census/CPS data compiled after the election. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 24, 2020 Hibernated