Dave Wasserman

@Redistrict ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 16, 2020

Created

Fri Oct 04 14:13:30 +0000 2019

Likes

146

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

The first group of indies has pretty much got the president “as seen on TV” in 2016. No letdown there. But the second group is where Dems’ opportunity lies. He hasn’t “drained the swamp” or proven adept at “art of the deal” on infrastructure, immigration, etc. Dysfunction rules. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 4, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

My working theory...there were two types of indies who voted for Trump in 2016: 1) voters who liked idea of an unfiltered (entertaining?) prez who drove politicians/media crazy 2) voters who saw DC as 100% broken and wanted to try something totally different to get stuff done — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 4, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Moral of the story: Dems aren’t likely to win many more converts by attacking Trump’s behavior/style. But they can probably win converts by arguing he fell right in line with the “swampy” Rs (esp. McConnell) to take away healthcare/cut taxes for rich & has made DC even worse. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 4, 2019 Hibernated