Dave Wasserman

@Redistrict ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 7, 2020

Created

Mon Sep 16 16:48:02 +0000 2019

Likes

130

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Not about winning the demog. It’s about Dems not getting absolutely annihilated. — PolitiTweet.org

@Redistrict I'm not seeing anything here in your analysis acknowledging that Democrats have won statewide and natio… https://t.co/B5gT2mBVGd

Posted Sept. 16, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

Moreover, the notion that voting behavior is polarized to the point that there aren't any swing/persuadable voters left isn't based in reality. Not only did we see above-average swings from '12 to '16, Dems wouldn't have gone +40 in '18 without converting lots of '16 R voters. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 16, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Dave Wasserman @Redistrict

The bottom line: Dems don't need to win a higher % of the WWC than in '16 b/c 1) it's declining as a % of voters and 2) Dems have made robust gains among college whites. But Dems *can't* afford to backslide much further & hope to win MI/PA/WI etc. And avoiding that isn't simple. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 16, 2019 Hibernated