Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 25, 2019

Created

Fri Feb 17 17:23:56 +0000 2017

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@jbarro @conorsen 1) conor's argument is that the gop is vulnerable bc too many R+4-5; 2) historically, wave miss a lot of R+1/2 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 17, 2017 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@conorsen and even then, that pace of converting R+5-10 districts (which is more like winning Washington or Texas) would leave you short — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 17, 2017 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@jbarro @conorsen of course it could. my point is that the GOP isn't better off by having more R+4-6 seats or whatever — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 17, 2017 Hibernated