Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 12, 2022

Created

Mon Jul 04 17:04:37 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@JayCostTWS you can tell the opposite story, though. politics radicalizes in the 1850s in part because the Senate at once rewards/encourages Southern intransigence and fuels northern fears of the 'slave power.' a proportional gvt passes the wilmot provisio. die is cast before radicalization — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 4, 2022

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@JayCostTWS i feel like you're conflating a theoretical benefit of overrepresenting small states with empirical reality on this? what's your exact counterfactual here? any law that was built into policy was enacted by the house too, after all. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 4, 2022

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@JayCostTWS anyway, i was mainly thinking about your story about the 'west'--not the south. clearly, if the south retained power in perpetuity, it wouldn't have seceded. the senate certainly advanced that, if it's your goal--the electoral college, interestingly, most certainly did not — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 4, 2022 Deleted after 23 seconds Just a Typo